Commercial relations between UK and Persian Gulf Sheikhdoms p.4

FO 371/156691 1961
CONFIDENTIAL

BRITISH RESIDENCY

BAHRAIN.

CONFIDENTIAL
(1120)

February 7, 1961

Please refer to your letter CRE 52/61 rf
January 13 in which you asked me to consider turning
my coni idential paper on commercial representation in
the Sruthern Gulf into an article for the Brard of
Trađe Journal.

2. I enclose a redraft of my confidential paper but
have had coubts about the wiasom of publishing it.
I have therefore consulted the Political Resident who,
while approving the confidential paper and the rearaft,
does not much like the idea of the latter being published
as an article in the Board of Traue Journal. The
Prlitical Resident considers that we are treading on
delicate ground and that such an article might ao us more
harm than guod. Hot. has suggested that the reüraft
might be circulated confidentially to interested firms
and associations rather than brought cut in the full
light of day.

3. I have borne in mind, when redrafting my paper, the
comments made by Bill Cranston in his letter (112113/61)

I January 25 but have not been able to relate them
entirely to circumstances in the Southern Gulf. We
agree that airect representatiun in each Gull territory
is now essential but I cannot agree, as Bill Cranston
suggests in paragraph 2 of his letter, that the local
merchants' desire to control all the business of their
own territories follows upon their acquiring the ability to
assume such control; nor can I agree that we should
discriminate against British trading houses.

4. The local merchants are ariven mainly by greed for
profits and their demand for direct agencies arose (and
still arises) long before they were able to handle them
efficiently. We have at present in Dubai the case
of local contractors agitating against foreign contractors,
whose work they cannot match. It is true, of course,
as my paper and arafts say, that many of the local
merchants are now as competent as foreigners; but it is
not true to say that only now that they are competent are
they demanding direct business relationships with
foreign principals. Only this morning I received a
visit from Abdul Jalil bin Mohamed of Abu Dhabi, who is
almost totally lacking in commercial experience,
demanding that agencies should be given to Abu Dhabi
nationals and not to foreigners (in which term he
included the merchants oſ Dubai).

5. As for the British trading houses, we are bound to
promote their interests - as long as these are not out of
step with Her Majesty's Government's local interests.
Nor should we be more royalist than the King': once a
local Ruler has iven permission for a British trading
house to operate in his territory. we must accept it as a
possible local agent for United Kingdom principals.
That local partnerships coula be beneficial is admitted,

except by Gray, Mackenzie whose decided policy is to go
W.N.Darling, ARIBORT.D.. CONFIDENTIAL.